<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show 027 - Ken Duncan, Part Two</title>
	<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/</link>
	<description>The Voices of Animation</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uros Setina</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63876</link>
		<dc:creator>Uros Setina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63876</guid>
		<description>Thomas, to xerox means simply to photocopy a peace of paper. Xerox is American company which started producing photocopy machines. AFAIK they were the only ones for some time, so the expression "to xerox something" stuck in the common language. I believe this expression is not used outside of English speaking countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, to xerox means simply to photocopy a peace of paper. Xerox is American company which started producing photocopy machines. AFAIK they were the only ones for some time, so the expression &#8220;to xerox something&#8221; stuck in the common language. I believe this expression is not used outside of English speaking countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Norman</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63856</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63856</guid>
		<description>I was able to listen to the interview on my iphone while flying to Pittsburgh last week. Great stuff as always, Clay. Sure makes the time fly past. More! More!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to listen to the interview on my iphone while flying to Pittsburgh last week. Great stuff as always, Clay. Sure makes the time fly past. More! More!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PEter</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63852</link>
		<dc:creator>PEter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63852</guid>
		<description>thanks for another great show. no problem with longer shows here. I listen to the Hollywood Saloon regularly and they've talked about how initially the podcasting community were adament about not crossing the half hour barrier and they've certainly proved that wrong with epic shows reaching up to 4 hours in length. Smodcast is another podcast that often goes beyond the hour mark, ditto with filmspotting. As long as there's the material to fill a show I'm all for it. Thanks again, I really appreciate these (I've listened to the whole library nearly a dozen times).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for another great show. no problem with longer shows here. I listen to the Hollywood Saloon regularly and they&#8217;ve talked about how initially the podcasting community were adament about not crossing the half hour barrier and they&#8217;ve certainly proved that wrong with epic shows reaching up to 4 hours in length. Smodcast is another podcast that often goes beyond the hour mark, ditto with filmspotting. As long as there&#8217;s the material to fill a show I&#8217;m all for it. Thanks again, I really appreciate these (I&#8217;ve listened to the whole library nearly a dozen times).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul N</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63849</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63849</guid>
		<description>How could more info be a problem?  Yep, chalk up another thumbs-up for the longer format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could more info be a problem?  Yep, chalk up another thumbs-up for the longer format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63845</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63845</guid>
		<description>Mark Mayerson, thank you. Dale Baer also talked about it in his interview and it all makes total sence to me now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Mayerson, thank you. Dale Baer also talked about it in his interview and it all makes total sence to me now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Maloney</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63844</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Maloney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63844</guid>
		<description>Whoops, I left my comment on length on part 1 instead of 2. you can read that one for what I had to say. In short, I prefer them longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I left my comment on length on part 1 instead of 2. you can read that one for what I had to say. In short, I prefer them longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mayerson</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mayerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63839</guid>
		<description>Thomas, 35 millimeter film passes through a projector at 90 feet a minute, so 90 feet equals 60 seconds.  In this interview, Ken mentions that he was animating 15 feet/week at the end of Tarzan, which means that he was animating 10 seconds a week.  Just multiply the number of feet by 2/3 to figure out the number of seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, 35 millimeter film passes through a projector at 90 feet a minute, so 90 feet equals 60 seconds.  In this interview, Ken mentions that he was animating 15 feet/week at the end of Tarzan, which means that he was animating 10 seconds a week.  Just multiply the number of feet by 2/3 to figure out the number of seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63836</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63836</guid>
		<description>Hey Clay,

It was awesome hearing myself on your podcast (Duncan, part ONE). Currently I do not have a web page, but I will post it once I do. 

Regarding the length of shows, I personally like the longer ones. It's much better to have a couple of shows in my library than several per interview. 

Two questions: 
1. You talk about how someone animates a certain amount of "feet" of animation. What does that mean?
2. (I don't know how to spell this) What does zerox/xerox/zerocs mean?

Thank you Clay.

Kindest regards,
Thomas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Clay,</p>
<p>It was awesome hearing myself on your podcast (Duncan, part ONE). Currently I do not have a web page, but I will post it once I do. </p>
<p>Regarding the length of shows, I personally like the longer ones. It&#8217;s much better to have a couple of shows in my library than several per interview. </p>
<p>Two questions:<br />
1. You talk about how someone animates a certain amount of &#8220;feet&#8221; of animation. What does that mean?<br />
2. (I don&#8217;t know how to spell this) What does zerox/xerox/zerocs mean?</p>
<p>Thank you Clay.</p>
<p>Kindest regards,<br />
Thomas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Keller</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63832</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63832</guid>
		<description>Hey there Clay!

I too am enjoying the new format.  It's great to hear how Ken Duncan mentioned the part in Toy Story, where Buzz realizes he's not a flying toy.  That scene is probably one of my favorites!!!  Keep up the fantastic work Clay, and I look forward to the next one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there Clay!</p>
<p>I too am enjoying the new format.  It&#8217;s great to hear how Ken Duncan mentioned the part in Toy Story, where Buzz realizes he&#8217;s not a flying toy.  That scene is probably one of my favorites!!!  Keep up the fantastic work Clay, and I look forward to the next one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Orellana</title>
		<link>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63831</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Orellana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://animationpodcast.com/archives/2008/06/09/ken-duncan-part-two/#comment-63831</guid>
		<description>Hey clay, glad to see you are doing more episodes i sorta lost interest after there was sort of a drought on episodes back around December i think.  glad i checked back to see if there were more episodes, these new episodes are so good keep up the great job and best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey clay, glad to see you are doing more episodes i sorta lost interest after there was sort of a drought on episodes back around December i think.  glad i checked back to see if there were more episodes, these new episodes are so good keep up the great job and best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
